SNS answers

Thinking thru the validity of Eyewitnesses   Q: Mark Matthew Luke and John; 4 Gospels; 4 different witnesses and 4 different stories. How would that even hold up in court? Theyre different so isnt someone lying?  - Jew,  seeking clarity A: Differences are normal with Eyewitnesses. Are you unaware of how eyewitness statements work? Think of 9/11. If you were alive. If not, go back to view the news videos. One main big event, 100k thousand or more witnesses from then gave different eyewitness statements to that event. Even the news anchors talked about all the various eyewitnesses. Even the 8 billion people on earth that saw that unfold either live on the air or in news about it just right after, or later that day. >> Even in the weeks and months after; the volunteers and govt agencies who tried to rescue people from the rubble, and their experiences in the clean up efforts.  5 years later they asked people "Where were you on 9/11?" I am an eyewitness to that eve...

Atheist professors like to decieve their students and brainwash them to manipulate them out of Christianity using Satans tactice from Eden--- doubt.  To Disbelieve God's Word.  Dont fall for it.  God gave the Gospels for a complete image of Jesus. The gospels are different for many reasons.  *The target audience is different *Differences are good! Eyewitness testimony is always different, but compatible with the rest of the witnesses story.  *The purpose of the eyewitness testimony has a purpose, as to why they wrote another one.  Let's look at it.                                                             (Click to view larger) In a nutshell: Matthew -  Focus: Revealing Jesus as The King  Mark - Focus: Jesus the Servant;  the perfect servant; the perfect sacrifice...